State of Sport Management Research in the first half of 2024: An overview

State of Sport Management Research in the first half of 2024 (January - June): An Overview

The current issue of the Sport Management Digest (SMD) provides a bibliometric analysis of the research published in the 10-sport management journals in the first half of 2024 – from January to June. The four thematic sections that follow, cover in sufficient detail research pertinent to different aspects of sport management. Owing to some editors stepping down and the time needed to replace them, we were unable to include a review of sport management theoretical developments, ethics research, leadership and communications which will be made available as soon as possible. Bibliometric analysis is the main tool used in science mapping, which allows to reveal the social, intellectual and organisational structure of sprot management as a discipline. Bibliometrics is an established computer-assisted quantitative review methodology, which identifies core research or authors, as well as their relationship. It provides valuable relational information on the topic, which helps significantly enhance our understanding of the overall state of the sport management discipline.
Following the established format, the present overview of research in the field of sport management focuses on three interrelated areas including a bibliometric analysis, theoretical and practical appeal of research, as measured by the funding received by different studies, and the democratization of knowledge, as exemplified by the number of studies published under the Open Access (OA) regime. In the first half of 2024, the ten sport management journals combined published 23 issues with 197 articles. This is a significant number of outputs which is on par with previous years. These outputs were produced by a diverse group of researchers including established and upcoming scholars as well as PhD students. Table 1 shows the ten journals and the number of articles per journal including the OA ones. The first half of 2024 saw 228 published articles in 28 issues across the ten journals, which is 20 less than the 248 produced in the second half of 2023. However, a positive has been the increase of percentage of OA articles to 23% (52), compared to 19% (49) in the second half of 2023. The International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship and European Sport Management Quarterly have been well ahead of the rest of the journals in this regard with 26% and 25% of their content published OA respectively. Xiaoyan Xing’s review in this issue offers a details analysis of the geography of sport management publications.

Table 1. Total number of articles and Open Access ones published in the 10 sport management journals in the second half of 2024 (January - June)

Journal	Founded	Publication frequency/ year	Impact Factor 2023	Articles No	Open Acces No %
Journal of Sport Management https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jsm/jsm-overview.xml	1987	5	3.5	15	4/12
Sport Management Review https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsmr20	1998	5	4.1	22	1/4
International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/1464-6668	1999	4	2.5	34	9/26
European Sport Management Quarterly https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/resm20	2001	5	3.9	40	10/25
International Journal of Sport Communications https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/ijsc/ijsc-overview.xml	2008	4	1.8	19	1/5
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/risp20	2009	4	2.8	20	8/40
Journal of Sports Economics https://journals.sagepub.com/home/jse	2011	6	2.1	26	3/12
Communication and Sport https://journals.sagepub.com/home/com	2013	6	2.7	27	4/15
Journal of Global Sport Management https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rgsm20	2016	4	2.2	17	2/12

As discussed in previous issues, the OA publication policy reflects an important imperative for the democratisation of knowledge, which suggests that all publically and privately funded research ought to be made freely available for users. The challenges of the OA policy have been addressed in earlier issues of the SMD including its prohibitive cost for many researchers and institutions. Nonetheless, it is important to keep stressing this issue as it plays a critical role in shaping the knowledge in the field and its utilization. Readers can check out the OA policy of their targeted journal by using the ‘Journal checker tool’ https://journalcheckertool.org/. Advances in digital technology and publishing have made it possible for journals to change their publication policy,particularly those published by Taylor & Francis (5 of the journals in the table). Editors and authors have now been instructed that there is no longer a cap on articles word count, which is typically between 8,000-10,000 words. This means that authors could use the greater word allowance to expand on different sections of their papers including the use of more illustrations. Journals’ special issues serve the important role of trailblazers because they submit for discussion topical and issues likely to shape research and policy agendas in the field of sprot management. The positive impact of journals’ special issues in sport management and sociology was analysed by Scelles (2021) and discussed in previous issues. Three out of the ten journals reviewed in the SMD have published special issues addressing agency and institutions in sport, mediating the Olympics and social media theory and practices. Eleven editors were responsible for soliciting, reviewing and editing these special issues. Individually and collectively, these special issues make a significant contribution to advancing our knowledge and the field of sport management in general. Table 2 shows the journals, special issues and guess editors.

Table 2. Special issues published by selected sport management journals (July- December 2024)

Journal	Special Issue Topic	Editors
European Sport Management Quarterly 2024 24 (1)	Agency and institutions in sports https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16184742.2023.2292102	Mathew Dowling, Jonathan Robertson, Marvin Washington, Becca Leopkey & Dana Ellis
Communication in Sport 2024 12 (1)	Mediating the East Asian Era of the Olympic Games (2018-2022)	Koji Kobayashi, John Horne, Younghan Cho & Jung Woo Lee
International Journal of Sport Communications 2024 17 (1)	Social media and Sport Research: Empirical Examinations Showcasing Diversity in Methods and Topics https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/ijsc/17/1/article-p1.xml	Jimmy Sanderson & Gashaw Abeza

A measure of the conceptual and practical relevance of sport management research to policy makers, practitioners and various public and private bodies is the funding provided to different research projects, which underpin the empirical studiespublished in the SMD. Naturally, the funding picture of current research is by no means complete due to lack of information about the external funding behind the research, but it does allow to note the geography and institutional support of sport management scholarly activities. The research published in the first half of 2024 was supported by several public and private agencies including the EU Horizon 2000 call, World Anti-Doping Agency, Australian Research Council and others. Figures 1 and 2 below provide a breakdown of the funding sources, countries and authors’ affiliation who published in four journals including the Journal of Global Sport Management, Journal of Sport Management, and International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing and the European Sport Management Quarterly. A proxy measure of the relationship between external funding of sport management research and its theoretical and practical appeal is the increased impact factor of most sport management journals in the sample including citation as a powerful measure of establishing the impact of journals on the research field (see Lis, 2020 analysis).

Figures 1. Research funding sponsor and country in the Journal of Global Sport Management, Journal of Sport Management, and International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing

Figures 2. Authors’ institutional affiliation, research funding sponsor and country in the European Sport Management Quarterly, Journal of Global Sport Management, Journal of Sport Management, and International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing

The bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus data base which provides access to all ten journals included in the SMD. As with previous issues, science mapping and visualization was achieved with the help of the VOSviewer software (van Eck & Waltman, 2020). The aim was to examine the strength of the links between sport management research by looking into the co-authorship links (i.e., the number of publications two researchers have co-authored), co-occurrence links (i.e., the number of publications in which two terms occur together), and the bibliographic coupling links (i.e., the number of cited references two publications have in common). The strength of the link is represented by a positive numerical value where the higher the value the stronger the link. The results are visualised in two figures (3 & 4) and capture all articles published in 2024. Thus, the co-authorship and co-occurrence links reported represent the sport management for the entire 2024 as it has not been possible to isolate the publications for the first six months only.
Figure 3 below depicts the co-authorship links where two authors had worked together on a publication. Out of 708 authors who published in the ten journals, 37 met the threshold of working together on three documents, and the different colours in figure 3 help see those collaborations. As can be seen, there have been six clusters of authors, who have collaborated on various projects and publications. However, it is worth noting that only five authors have actually collaborated while the rest of the clusters do not appear to be connected. Billings, Sanderson and Brown have the strongest links of 10, 7 and 6 respectively.

Figure 3. Co-authorship network visualization across ten sport management journals in 2024

The co-occurrence links, representing the number of publications in which two terms occur together can be seen in Figure 4. Out of 916 key words, 25 met the threshold of occurring more than 5 times. The size of the word indicates its weight, and the number of links its strength. Like previous reviews, the words ‘social media’ showed the greatest strength of 18, followed by agenda setting and framing each with strength of 11. The dominance of word occurrence of ‘social media’ can be attributed in part to the very high number of articles (46) published in the two sport communications journals which account for 20% of the total number of articles published in this period. Figure 4 also helps to see the distance between two words where the higher the distance the lesser the connectedness. For example, the word ‘social media’ dominated in the research published, followed by ‘agenda setting’, ‘framing’, ‘professional sport’ and ‘content analysis’. As figure 4 reveals, the words ‘social media’ are closely connected to ‘professional sport’, ‘branding and ‘sport marketing’. This analysis helps build a picture of the role of social media in shaping agenda and perceptions about sports and consumers’ preferences as well as its role as a main tool of modern sport marketing. It is also important to acknowledge the role of social media in raising awareness about wider social issues concerning mental health and corporate social responsibility.
The power of the different types of networks and the author co-citation (ACC) analysis lies in their ability to reveal the intellectual structure of the sport management discipline.

Figure 4. Key words co-occurrence network visualization in ten sport management journals in 2024

It ought to be noted that the SMD does not claim to provide a comprehensive analysis of sport management research globally as many studies get published outside the selected 10 journals included in this review. We do hope, however, that the Sport Management Digest offers valuable guide to scholars, practitioners and students of sport. The high-level summaries included in this issue can serve as an entry point for understanding the intellectual structure of the discipline, the authors and centresresponsible for producing the studies as well as the topical issues discussed. It is hoped that it will help in stimulating debates and in informing decisions about research projects and teaching strategies.
Enjoy your exploration of the Sport Management Digest!
 

References

Lis, A. (2020). Sport management: Bibliometric study of key sources titles in the research field. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20 (4), 2423-2430. Scelles, N. (2021). "Impact of the special issues in sport management and sociology journals." Managing sport and leisure: 1-15.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2020). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3